Open Enrollment | Subscribe to Publishing Executive HERE
Connect
Follow us on
Advertisement
 
Senior Editor

Pub Talk

By James Sturdivant

About James

 

B2B Beat

Andy Kowl
Earned Media vs. Native Advertising: Smart Publishers Find a Path for Advertiser Content
Mar 3, 2015

An insidious term has started to be widely used these past couple of years. As publishers, we must stamp out...



Publishers' Dojo

Linda Ruth
How to Look at Your 2014 Sales
Feb 23, 2015

So far I have spent 2015 deep in analyses of publishers' sales in 2014 and before. That probably puts me...



Media Vent

Bob Sacks
Why Print Magazines Are Not Necessarily Facing Armageddon
Feb 19, 2015

My optimism may be hard to understand with all the data that on the surface seems so damned negative. To...



Industry Insiders

The Insiders
The Real Cost of Content Marketing
Dec 10, 2014

How do you respond to advertisers who want to blog more and advertise less? Do you discuss with them the...



The Digital Market

Thea Selby
Top 5 Mobile Trends for Publishers—It’s Good News, Folks
Jul 7, 2014

Mary Meeker of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers is one of my s/heroes. In this day and age of branded...



Publisher's Paradox

Andrew Davis
Publisher’s Paradox: Your Newsletter Subscribers Are Being Overfed
Apr 28, 2014

Charlie Magazine, based in Charleston, South Carolina, isn't asking its readers to subscribe to everything. Instead, Charlie is inviting readers...



Disrupting 'Disruptive' and Other Impacts of the Word Wars

1
 
Earlier this month we were hit with the annual lists of the most annoying words of 2012. Cliche-spotting has become a favorite year-end pastime on the coasts as media and tech-types decide (often after months of incessantly using them themselves) that certain buzzwords or turns of phrase are just so over.

And then there is the periodic controversy surrounding the latest additions to the Oxford English Dictionary. This time around, these words may include  "dumbphone," "'flexitarian" and "omnishambles."

I am inclined to give newly popular words and phrases the benefit of the doubt, assuming until strong evidence appears to the contrary that they do represent a new shade of meaning, and thus can enrich the language, and will get weeded out sooner or later if they fail in this—all of which means that the articles policing annoying or unnecessary words can themselves seem annoying or unnecessary.

But the worst part about all this word policing is that it sullies some very nice words and phrases before they even have a chance to trickle down. A few too many mentions in Wired or Ad Age and—wham!—a word we're all still getting used to is suddenly passé. My local restaurant reviewer may never have a chance to use a fine word like "twee," "meme" or "curate." Is it too late for that unusual Asian fusion dish at my local eatery to be "disruptive"? (Is "Asian fusion" even still a thing?)

Have trends replaced actual culture? Can anything stick around long enough to fully sink in, spread through the muskeg and take on new meanings, influences and iterations? Can words, like cuisines, no longer evolve without a hyphen? Can "bemused" ever be allowed to mean "slightly amused," as many seem to want it to, rather than confused?

But I digress.

Lets us media types try to remember that we can get sick of words or phrases others do not even know yet. Rather than fawn over, overuse and condemn them, let's try to give them some time to settle into the lexicon. To allow a nice word to flame out is to chip away at one of the greatest features of the English language—useful synonyms. 

Having said all that, I really do hate when people use "literally" to mean "truly." And don't get me started on the one about the Kimono.
1

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments: