Open Enrollment | Subscribe to Publishing Executive HERE
Connect
Follow us on
Advertisement
 
Senior Editor

Pub Talk

By James Sturdivant

About James

 

Industry Insiders

The Insiders
Are You Protecting Your Site From Click Fraud?
Apr 23, 2015

By now magazine publishers have expanded their properties to the web, providing readers a fast, easy way to access content....



Media Vent

Bob Sacks
Do New ASME Rules Damage Magazine Industry's Integrity?
Apr 16, 2015

It seems to me that my opinion on the changes to the ASME guidelines will be in the minority. To...



Publishers' Dojo

Linda Ruth
Online Resources You Might Not Be Using, Part 1: Content Analytics
Apr 13, 2015

Publishers who have worked in internet marketing since the beginning might remember, as I do, when lots of tedious programming...



The Digital Market

Thea Selby
Top 5 Trends Affecting App Publishing
Mar 9, 2015

This is a great time of the year to look at the top trends of 2014 and gain insights for...



B2B Beat

Andy Kowl
Earned Media vs. Native Advertising: Smart Publishers Find a Path for Advertiser Content
Mar 3, 2015

An insidious term has started to be widely used these past couple of years. As publishers, we must stamp out...



Publisher's Paradox

Andrew Davis
Publisher’s Paradox: Your Newsletter Subscribers Are Being Overfed
Apr 28, 2014

Charlie Magazine, based in Charleston, South Carolina, isn't asking its readers to subscribe to everything. Instead, Charlie is inviting readers...



Newspapers Confront Competing Realities

 
Mike Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch both love newspapers. Murdoch loves the Wall Street Journal so much he bought it (even though he thought the articles were a bit long), made it lose weight, trussed it up a bit with color and reshaped it into a general interest newspaper.

Bloomberg speaks lovingly of the Financial Times. When asked recently if he might buy the paper, he responded "I buy it every day!" (Talk about a hedge.) His staff loves it too, believing it would be a game-changing platform for Bloomberg's high-quality content, creating a new global forum for deep dives into business and finance that could, the thinking goes, fill a niche left underserved by Murdoch's changes to the WSJ.

It all makes so much sense—except financially. And here's the rub for the media business. A company produces an excellent product, which people love. There's synergy (to use a cursed term) with the business operations of a potential deep-pocketed buyer. Yet, it's still a tough sell, because it doesn't make a lot of money. When quality and passion—even profits (but not much growth)—can't get people to open their checkbook, what can?

Newspapers, whatever they try to tell you, are far from out of the woods, because it is still the case that digital advertising revenue cannot approach what can be earned from print. It's not even close. It may be an old story at this point, but it's no less critical an issue than it was a couple of years ago. Markets pay attention to trends, and even a paper with 600,000 subscribers and a robust paywall is a tough sell, because as subscribers move from print to digital, the ad revenue does not keep up. Without huge spikes in either subscribers or ad rates, the line will continue to point in the wrong direction.

Maybe Bloomberg could bring those new subscribers. Maybe ancillary products, licensing, services and events could fill the gap. Maybe—but it's a risk. Maybe Mayor Mike should get Warren Buffett on the horn.

Companies Mentioned:

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments: