Postal Regulatory Commission Denies Rate Hike Request
The Postal Regulatory Commission announced this morning that it would not approve the U.S. Postal Service's request for an "exigent" price increase.
"We have concluded that we must deny the Postal Service's request," Commission Chairman Ruth Goldway said in a prepared statement. She said the decision "is a consensus, and is unanimous."
Citing a projected deficit of nearly $7 billion over the next fiscal year, the Postal Service in July asked the regulatory commission to approve the special rate increase. Under the law, the USPS must demonstrate "extraordinary or exceptional" circumstances to justify any rate increase not tagged to the Consumer Price Index.
Goldway said the Postal Service's justification for a special rate increase did not meet the intent of the law. "The exigent rate provision is ... carefully crafted," she noted. "Congress made it narrow." She said that all three provisions of the law had not been met and that the "summary cause" of the cash flow crisis was structural rather than due to extrordinary external factors.
Without employee retirement benefit payments mandated by Congress, the Postal Service would not be insolvent, Goldway said. "Adding [those] payments back produces a positive cash balance," she said. The USPS has made significant strides in reducing costs, she added.
In a July press release announcing proposed the rate hike, the Postal Service cited "plummeting mail volume traced to the recession and increased use of the Internet" as reasons for the rate hike proposal. Mailer advocacy group the Affordable Mail Alliance said these factors should not be considered a qualifying circumstance under the standards established by Congress, as they are part of the normal business cycle.
"The Postal Service needs to cut costs and modernize rather than raise rates an average of ten times the rate of inflation," the Alliance said in an August press release. "... The ups and downs of economic cycles, like changes in the weather, are not 'extraordinary' or 'exceptional' circumstances."